Loading...
09-03-2024 Meeting Minutes BOC September 3, 2024 1 PERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS September 3, 2024 MEMBERS PRESENT OTHERS PRESENT Gordon Powell Katherine M. Cathey, County Manager C. Derrick Sims Michele Solomon, Clerk to the Board Kyle W. Puryear T.C. Morphis, Jr., County Attorney Charlie Palmer Jason Thomas The Board of Commissioners for the County of Person, North Carolina, met in regular session on Tuesday September 3, 2024 at 6:00 p.m.in the Commissioners’ Boardroom 215 in the Person County Office Building located at 304 S. Morgan Street, Roxboro, NC. Chairman Powell called the meeting to order. Chairman Powell offered an invocation, and Commissioner Palmer led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance. DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF AGENDA: A motion was made by Commissioner Puryear and carried 5-0 to approve the agenda with the addition of the following two items of new business: Item #5 A Resolution Setting a Public Hearing for Closure of a Portion of SR 1333 Country Club Road, and Item #6 The Fourth Amendment to the Option Agreement between the Wagstaff’s and Person County. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PRIVATE ROADWAY BRATTA FARM DRIVE TO BE ADDED TO THE DATATBASE FOR E-911 DISPATCHING A motion was made by Commissioner Puryear and carried 5-0 to open the duly advertised public hearing for Consideration of Approval of Private Roadway Bratta Farm Drive to be added to the Database for E-911 Dispatching. GIS Director Sallie Vaughn stated that the owners of four parcels of land along an access easement are adding dwellings. She stated that when a third home gets added to a private driveway, it is required to name that driveway by the County Ordinance regulating addresses and road naming in Person County. She stated that the family came up with and agreed upon the name of Bratta Farm Drive. She stated that the name is consistent and compliant with the Person County Ordinance. There were no individuals appearing before the Board to speak in favor of or in opposition to the Consideration of Approval of Private Roadway Bratta Farm Drive to be added to the Database for E-911 Dispatching. September 3, 2024 2 A motion was made by Vice Chairman Sims and carried 5-0 to close the public hearing for Consideration of Approval of Private Roadway Bratta Farm Drive to be added to the Database for E-911 Dispatching. CONSIDERATION TO GRANT OR DENY CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PRIVATE ROADWAY BRATTA FARM DRIVE TO BE ADDED TO THE DATABASE FOR E-911 DISPATCHING A motion was made by Vice Chairman Sims and carried 5-0 to approve Private Roadway Bratta Farm Drive to be added to the Database for E-911 Dispatching. INFORMAL COMMENTS: The following individuals appeared before the Board to make informal comments: Andrea Childers of 270 Blackberry Lane, Rougemont stated that she has been a resident of Person County for almost 32 years. She stated that she and her husband watched the movie Dark Waters last week. She stated that this was a good movie, that she would recommend the Board to watch and educate themselves. She stated, then after watching the movie, to ask themselves how many times in our nation’s history must corporations teach our government at all levels, local, state, and federal, that they cannot be trusted to regulate themselves. She stated that before this lesson is learned, the only thing corporations care about is their bottom line, making the largest profit that is possible. She stated that they care nothing about being a good corporate neighbor, nothing about the health and safety of the communities in which they set up shop, and they care nothing about the environment that they are polluting. She stated that Dominion cares nothing about Person County. She stated that the only thing that Person County can do is set up air monitors at both ends of the County to ensure that the air that we are breathing is not poisoning us, our friends, and our loved ones. She referenced two articles, the first, an article from The News and Observer, written by Adam Wagner, titled “Is Dominion underestimating the toxic air pollution from its proposed NC gas storage site?”, the second, an article from the Appalachian Voice, written by Lara Howell, titled” Community Outcry in Person County: Concerns rise over proposed liquefied methane storage facility”. September 3, 2024 3 DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA: A motion was made by Commissioner Palmer and carried 5-0 to approve the Consent Agenda with the following items: A. Approval of Minutes of August 19, 2024, B. Budget Amendment #5, and C. Resolution Ratifying Extension of an Option and Purchase Agreement NEW BUSINESS: ALS360 (FIRE COMPONENT) PROPOSAL FOLLOW-UP County Manager Katherine Cathey stated that on August 22, 2024 the Fire Chief’s Association met with Vice Chairman Sims present as well as Emergency Services Director Thom Schwalenberg, EMS Division Chief Heather Chandler, and two representatives from each department. She stated that during the meeting, they discussed the fire component of the ALS360 program that we have been reviewing for several months. She stated that a vote was taken at the meeting, with the Chiefs voting in favor of using fire tax funds to support the ALS360 program with seven departments voting for the proposal and two voting against it. She stated that after the vote, each department made requests for the equipment that they felt would best meet the needs of the citizens they serve. She stated that the requests were driven primarily by geography of their districts and standardization of their fleet. She stated that the original proposal provided the Board with a recommendation for two AED’s and one LUCAS device for each department. She stated that after the fire department submitted their request, it did increase the total requested by four AED’s and four LUCAS devices. She stated that the seven departments who voted in favor of, have all requested equipment. She stated that Timberlake Volunteer Fire and Rescue did not vote in favor of participating in the program, therefore there is no equipment included for that department. She stated that Roxboro-Person County Rescue Squad also voted in opposition of the program, stating that they act as a support agency that arrives on scene after the fire departments are already there, and for them to have a LUCAS device would not provide an added benefit since the fire departments on scene would likely have the device already there with them. She stated that they have recently updated their AED’S and did not state a need for additional machines. September 3, 2024 4 The following table represents the new equipment that each department is requesting: Department AED LUCAS Allensville VFD 2 1 Ceffo VFD 4 2 Hurdle Mills VFD 4 2 Semora VFD 2 1 Triple Springs VFD 4 2 Moriah VFD 4 2 Roxboro FD* 0 3 Timberlake VFR 0 0 Roxboro-PC Rescue Squad** 0 0 Total 20 13 * Roxboro FD recently purchased 7 LP1000 AED’s for their agency. These AED’s would be moved under the County maintenance plan for consistency, data and asset management and performance improvement. ** Rescue recently upgraded their AED’s and stated they are a support agency that responds into a fire district to support a department already on scene, so they felt having a LUCAS would not provide an additional benefit. Their desire was instead to focus on specialty training and certifications that more closely align with their primary mission. Cathey stated that Stryker provided a revised quote that incorporates the additional equipment requested. She stated that the total would be $113,206 annually., which is an increase over the previous amount, which was $80,562. Chairman Powell stated that he understood the reasoning for the rescue squad, and asked Cathey what was Timberlake’s reason. Cathey replied, it is her understanding, as she was not present at the meeting, that Timberlake did not provide a reason during their vote. Powell asked Cathey what happens with Timberlake and their department since they voted in opposition and did not request any equipment. Cathey stated that it is up to the Commissioners to decide. She stated that the Board allocated the funding towards the program and before them this evening is for consideration of what has been requested by the Fire Chief’s Association. She stated that with one fire department not having that equipment, then it is not going to be readily available by First Responders, who would be the first on the scene most of the time in that part of the County in the Timberlake District, whereas, it would be available elsewhere in the County with all the other departments who requested the equipment. September 3, 2024 5 Cathey stated that as Commissioners, they could decide that this is a program that they would like to make sure is available throughout the County and could fund the equipment for Timberlake and work with them on implementing that part of the program, or they could approve what has been requested without including Timberlake, or they could choose not to move forward with the program. She stated that this is at the Board’s discretion on how they wish to proceed. Commissioner Thomas asked if there was a warranty on this equipment. Cathey stated that this program is a ten-year program, and along with the program there is a maintenance and service contract that is there for each piece of the equipment. She stated that Stryker will come on-site to complete annual maintenance on the equipment and to make repairs. She stated that the maintenance numbers are incorporated in the total annual cost of $113,206. She stated that the plan covers the initial purchase of the equipment and a refresh of the equipment over the ten-year period; therefore, it purchases a second piece of equipment, so you are really getting two pieces of equipment. Vice Chairman Sims asked if there was any extra cost for when Stryker comes to replace the equipment after six years. Cathey stated that no extra costs would be incurred when it comes time to refresh, which is covered under the plan as it is part of the program. Sims stated that he had concerns with the contract, and asked what happens if the County decides to cancel the contract three or four years in, what cost would the County have to pay. Cathey stated that she does not have a specific number. She stated that as presented in a previous program overview, one of the exit options is, before the ten years has expired, the County could purchase the equipment at fair market value based on residual cost formula. Factors to determine value would include age of equipment, condition of equipment, and market influences. She stated that the County would be required to give Stryker ninety days’ notice. She stated that she completed some rough estimates of what that might look like, and again it is unknown as to what the exact figure would be at any given point in time because of factors that can change. She stated that if you look at the initial purchase, specific to EMS, in that example, it would be purchasing $1.5 M worth of equipment. She stated that if you just depreciate that, the lifespan is seven to eight years then you look at that after two years, you are at around $1.36M, which is the fair market value, at four years you would be at about $655K. She stated that if the County were to choose to exit the program, they would be paying the fair market value for whatever equipment they have at that time. Any damaged equipment that would have been replaced sooner than expected would not have depreciated as much. She stated that there are other factors that could influence it, such as adding to our fleet over time. Sims asked if the VFD’s would need training on this device, and does it require EMT certification to operate it. Cathey stated that she is not sure if it requires EMT certification. After confirming with Schwalenberg, she stated that First Responders who are in the First Responders Program can utilize this equipment and do not have to be EMT’s. Sims stated that if we have an emergency situation and the VFD is first on scene, and they do not have this device, they would have to do chest compressions until someone comes with the device. Cathey verified that was correct, that without the device, manual compressions would have to be done. September 3, 2024 6 Cathey stated that each department has worked to identify who they typically have on scene first and would likely have that person equipped with the LUCAS device. Sims stated that some of the departments are requesting two of these devices, and he questions how often they would use the device. He stated that his concern is that the VFD’s get the devices and they sit in their vehicle for years and do not get used. He stated that the County is putting a lot of money into this, and his concern is how often would the devices get used. He stated that we certainly want to save a life and do not want to put a value on it. He stated that with EMS, they are the ones that would be using the devices equipped on their ambulances. Cathey stated that what she heard in the meeting that she attended, prior to the August 22, 2024 meeting, was that for these departments that requested more than one, it was because they have a substation, and the departments that have substations are generally larger geographically, and by having two devices, that provides them a better ability to be on scene quicker with one of those in the larger geographically spread-out fire districts. She stated that there was discussion amongst them of not knowing how much this would be put to use, but in the event that the need arises this could be a very useful piece of life saving equipment, and a big asset. Sims stated that in that meeting a couple of departments questioned the cost and how much we are actually paying with this program versus if we just went out and bought it from another medical supply company. He stated that he understands that there is a maintenance program where Stryker will come and replace the devices and those sorts of things. He stated concerns about the replacement of the batteries for the devices, as you can go to a medical supply store and get batteries for $400, and through this program, it is $900. He stated that is a lot of money that the County is committing to with this program, and as a County Commissioner, it is about the best way to spend the money. He stated that he knows the VFD’s voted on this, and said they wanted this program, and he hopes that three or four years down the road we are not saying we should not have done this program. Sims stated that the reports that Schwalenberg provided to him, some of the numbers that were given indicate eight years on the LUCAS devices, and they have three LUCAS devices that are six years old and three that are a year old. He asked are we going to be compensated somehow or are we just going to go ahead and get all six new LUCAS devices. Cathey advised that there is a trade-in value recognized as part of this program. Sims asked if it was a good trade-in, and is it worth it. Cathey advised that she did not know the exact dollar figures on that. Chairman Powell expressed concerns about the devices potentially not being used and sitting on a shelf gathering dust. He asked how local are the technicians that would service the equipment. Cathey advised that there is a local technician in Person County. Powell stated that we have a lot of equipment, being requested and this is a significant investment for the County. He referenced the Person County tax flyer insert that just went out to taxpayers. He stated that the flyer shows the percentage of County funding, with Public Safety being number one. He stated that this shows the dedication of this Board to Public Safety and the safety of our citizens countywide. He stated that he would hate to see any one or more departments separate and not be a part of a countywide effort to provide consistent service to citizens countywide. September 3, 2024 7 Powell asked does it ever happen where a call goes out and you have two departments responding at one time. Cathey stated yes for structure fires you may see more than one department responding. She stated that she is unsure about EMS calls. Powell asked, would there be consistency among our volunteers to provide them with top quality equipment and they all be on the same page with someone in each department, and each section of the County that is familiar with, and has the training and ability to use this equipment that we are considering buying. Commissioner Palmer stated that you have one particular fire department right in the center of the County, and then you have Hurdle Mills to our west, and Moriah to the east, both of which are approximately fifteen- to twenty-minute drives, dependent upon how fast they go between there and Timberlake. He stated that could be a disaster and feels that the County should provide Timberlake with the equipment, whether they choose to use it or not. Commissioner Puryear asked Sims at the meeting he attended, did Timberlake express why they do not want the equipment, and do they already have it on hand. Sims stated that Timberlake just got AED’s, and did not feel they needed the other AED’s. He stated that Timberlake did not think they would be using the LUCAS device. He stated that when they arrive on scene, they would immediately start CPR, doing chest compressions, and that sort of thing. He stated the device is big and having to carry it around, where would it fit on their trucks that they would be using is the impression he got from them as to why they do not want the equipment. He stated that he thinks that Timberlake feels like that money could be spent more wisely somewhere else. Puryear stated that Timberlake has the most calls and does not understand why they do not want the equipment. He stated that the Fire Chief’s Association requested the equipment, and if they feel as though those departments need the equipment, who better to know the needs better than the departments themselves. He stated it is a little puzzling to him about Timberlake. Sims stated that he understands what Palmer was saying and getting at, but if Timberlake does not want the equipment, and are not going to use it, then let’s do not waste the money by giving them the equipment that they do not want and will not use. Sims stated that Timberlake already has AED’s and does not want the LUCAS. He stated that he thinks that the Board could look at other compensation for Timberlake, as they do not want to be involved in this program. Cathey stated that the quote is to fund the program as requested by the Fire Chief’s Association, and is the number of each device that has been requested by each individual fire department, and would fund the program as a whole. She stated that it would go in the Contracted Services line item, and there will not be a certain amount of funding allocated to each department for equipment. She stated that part of the reason for standardizing the equipment through the Stryker program, for example with the AED’s, the devices would collect data in the same manner that the County AED’s collected data, the cords can be unplugged from the pads on the AED that is attached to the patient when EMS shows up, and we can connect our device to the pads. She stated the interrelationship and operability of the equipment is an asset through this program. She stated that she thinks many of the fire departments have purchased AED’s with grant funding, so they do have some newer equipment that is not the same brand or the same specifications as this particular equipment. September 3, 2024 8 Cathey stated that the price difference was noted, as these are ruggedized, as they are meant to be used in the field, and some of the AED’s out there in service are currently past their service life or either not the same ruggedized quality that these would be. She stated that this is the same as the AED’s in the County buildings, as they have been acquired over many years, and consist of different models and ages. She stated that this is an effort to standardize the equipment so that people are familiar with the same type, they can be serviced together, and budgeted through this program. Powell stated how do you handle this if one or more departments are not participating and you receive a 911 call. He stated as he for one, would want someone trained and to be there promptly to take care of him, and does not think anyone else would feel any differently. He stated that is what we are doing here, providing Public Safety, and he is a little miffed as to why Timberlake does not want to participate, but that is their call. He asked what kind of data sharing would go along with these devices, for example with the hospitals, etc. Schwalenberg stated that there are three data streams. The first data stream is asset management, which would be able to track all of these assets across the spectrum. He provided an example, and stated that if Allensville responds to a call and they put the patient on their LUCAS device, we are not going to take the patient off that LUCAS device because that would cause an interruption in patient care. He stated that they would give Allensville a LUCAS device off of the medic unit and take Allensville’s LUCAS device with the patient. He stated that having everybody in the same system allows the equipment to be tracked, and it does not matter whose it is, as it is all County equipment. He stated that the asset management program tracks the equipment so they know what equipment is where at any given time. He stated that the equipment does a self- check every day and runs a diagnostic on itself that will alert if that piece of equipment is found to have a fault of any kind. He stated that this does not replace by any means, the provider needing to check the equipment. He stated the second data stream is performance improvement, which is from the time the first device is placed on the patient, they immediately start tracking performance data on how those people are providing that care. He stated that it is not meant to be a disciplinary thing, it is meant to see how we can improve the care that we are providing to the citizens, and track patient care from beginning to end. He stated that the third stream is data transference from the scene to the hospital. He stated that this allows them to transmit data to the hospital, so that the hospital will have that information readily available once the patient arrives. He stated that it is all about patient care. Sims asked, if he is a VFD, does that data help him out at all, since EMS would be on the way, and would have the data. He stated from a VFD status, he does not see how that information is important to the VFD, He stated that EMS would be there in a matter of minutes to start working on the patient and EMS and the hospital would have the data. Schwalenberg stated that it is about providing the best patient care. He stated that the data could be used as a training tool and for performance improvement to see what could have been done differently and to see what areas need more improvement. He stated that CPR, no matter how good you are at it, will never be as good as that machine for giving consistent compressions. September 3, 2024 9 Sims stated who is this helping, the information that Schwalenberg wants to get for his EMS team and for the hospital, he is wondering why this money is coming out of the fire tax. He stated why wouldn’t we just put this under the EMS budget as it seems like it is helping more from a data collection standpoint for them. Cathey stated that the way she views it, it is ultimately helping the patient, which is the reason behind it. She stated having it earlier on scene with fire personnel, it is helping the patient to be able to get the data, and it can also be used for training purposes as Schwalenberg shared. She stated as far as the funding source goes, when we began looking at this program, it made sense to her that it come out of the Fire Tax because it is equipment that is housed within the fire departments and is being utilized by the first responders. She stated that is why she made the recommendation for it to come out of the Fire Tax. She stated that there is nothing to say that it cannot come out of the General Fund, it was a way of looking at how best to utilize the revenue sources that are available to the County. She stated that since this fit within the purposes for the Fire and Rescue Tax District, that is why she included it in the recommended budget to come out of that funding source. Sims asked if it could have come out of the General Fund. Cathey stated yes, it could have, but as the Board knows it was a tight budget year in putting together those numbers. She stated that if it were to come out of the General Fund, it is either pulling more out of the ARP Funding that we have already allocated towards year one of this program or allocating Fund Balance, and then it is going to create a larger gap to make up for in the next budget cycle to build that in on an annual basis. She stated that the County has a steady stream coming in within the Fire and Rescue Tax District, and we can count on having that again next year to cover this. She stated that we already know that we are going to be challenged with fitting the EMS component into the General Fund Budget since we have allocated the ARP Funding towards that this year. Powell stated greater transparency and accountability, and it seems to him, it is in the right place now, rather than the General Fund, as it is easier to follow, and easier to account for. Commissioner Thomas had concerns about the maintenance fees associated with the equipment through the program. Schwalenberg stated that when you talk about the equipment fee, anywhere from thirty-six to sixty months, that equipment is going to be replaced, so that figure actually reflects two purchases of equipment. He stated that the maintenance fee is spread out over ten years for the life of that equipment. He stated that includes replacing all batteries, all pads, all suction devices that the LUCAS device uses, replacing all of that expendable equipment now unless something happens to a piece of equipment because of someone being grossly negligent, and all routine stuff. He stated that the LUCAS device has a one-year manufacturer’s warranty. He stated that the AED’s have a five-year warranty. He stated that both warranties do not cover maintenance. Cathey stated that County Attorney T.C. Morphis, Jr. reviewed the Stryker Contract, and he did raise the question as to whether or not it would require LGC approval. She stated that she and Interim Finance Officer Tracy Clayton met with the LGC earlier today, and the General Statute for a Capital Lease, which this falls under as a Capital Equipment Lease, states that if it is over a five-year term and the value is over $500K, then it does require LGC approval. September 3, 2024 10 Cathey stated it is a similar process that the County just did with the LOB’s, but not quite as involved. She stated that LGC staff stated that they could get it on the October 1, 2024 LGC Agenda, and they would need the County to submit the application packet this week. She stated that this does require the Board of Commissioners to approve a Resolution authorizing the County to submit the application packet. She stated that the LGC stated that if the Board expresses support for the County getting authorization, then we can go ahead and submit the application this week. She stated that she could put the Resolution on the Board’s Consent Agenda for September 16, 2024. Puryear stated he does not think it needs to go on the Consent Agenda. Morphis stated that there were a few minor things with the contract. He stated that LGC approval was one thing that he noticed needed to be done. He stated that the first step is to determine if the Commissioners want to proceed with the program. If not, then there is no LGC approval. He stated that if they do proceed with the program, he does not think there will be any issues with the LGC and approval. Puryear asked what was the total new amount that needed to be taken out from the Fire Tax Fund. Cathey stated that it is $113,205.50 annually, and she rounded it up to $113,206. Puryear asked where the funding would be coming from in the future, would it be reoccurring annually from the Fire Tax Fund. Cathey replied yes, it would be reoccurring annually from the Fire Tax Fund. Puryear stated that he wants the fire departments to fully understand that this is not a one-time hit on the Fire Tax Fund, that this is a commitment going forth, and that money is going to be committed to this. He stated that the VFD’s may have future needs as it relates to staffing and hiring more additional part-time staff. He stated he just wants to make sure they understand this and that it is reoccurring, not a one-time thing. He stated that he thinks this message needs to be communicated to the Fire Chiefs Association in case they do not understand and know that already. Cathey stated that she believes they do. She stated that the handout the Fire Chiefs received says it is $80,562 per year. She stated that was part of the conversation as far as this being an annual payment. She stated that it was discussed in the meeting that she attended with the Fire Chiefs, about the current fund balance available within the Fire Tax Fund, and that is something that can be utilized in the future for unanticipated needs. She stated that it is there in case the needs grow to a greater degree than the revenues grow, and we will have that funding available to allocate in years to come to avoid future tax increases. She stated that we do have a healthy fund balance of $1.5M in the Fire Tax District Fund. Puryear stated he would like to request the Chairman and Vice Chairman to speak with the Fire Chiefs Association to ensure that they have a good understanding of what is being committed. A motion was made by Commissioner Palmer and carried 5-0 to fund the ALS360 Fire Component Proposal as requested by the Fire Chiefs Association and for the Board of Commissioners Chair and Vice Chair to speak with all the Fire Chiefs to ensure they understand the program. September 3, 2024 11 RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR CLOSURE OF A PORTION OF SR 1333 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD A motion was made by Commissioner Puryear and carried 5-0 to approve the Resolution and call for a Public Hearing on September 24, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. September 3, 2024 12 September 3, 2024 13 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE OPTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE WAGSTAFFS AND PERSON COUNTY A motion was made by Commissioner Palmer and carried 5-0 to approve the Fourth Amendment to the Option and Purchase Agreement. September 3, 2024 14 September 3, 2024 15 September 3, 2024 16 September 3, 2024 17 September 3, 2024 18 September 3, 2024 19 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT: Chairman Powell reported that he attended the following two meetings: Vaya Health Board Meeting and the Person County Board of Health Meeting. He stated that he was unable to attend the Sappony Tribe Highway Marker Dedication, due to a prior commitment, and extended an apology to the Sappony Tribe for his absence. MANAGER’S REPORT: County Manager Katherine Cathey advised that the County closed on the LOB’s last week. She stated that Friday, the County closed on the Carolina Pride Carwash Building, to be used as PCC’s CHATT Building. She provided an update about Broadband for Person County, and potential grant funding. She stated that CCR Consultants is hosting a Community Forum on September 17, 2024 from 6-7:30 p.m. at the Person County Office Building Auditorium, in reference to DSS and the ongoing work with CCR. COMMISSIONER REPORT/COMMENTS: Vice Chairman Sims stated that he attended the following meetings and events over the past few weeks: 8/21- Food Lion Ribbon-Cutting Ceremony 8/22- Fire Chief’s Association Meeting 8/28- Cry Freedom Missions Coffee Hour at Golden Corral 8/31- Sappony Tribe Highway Marker Dedication Commissioner Palmer stated that he attended the Ribbon-Cutting Ceremony at Food Lion. He stated that he attended the Sappony Tribal Marker Dedication. Commissioner Puryear stated that he attended the Sappony Tribal Highway Marker Dedication, and it was a great informative event. Commissioner Thomas apologized for not attending the Sappony Tribal Marker Dedication. September 3, 2024 20 A motion was made by Vice Chairman Sims and carried 5-0 to enter in to closed sessions at 7:17 p.m. CLOSED SESSION #1 A motion to enter into Closed Session #1 per General Statute 143-318.11(a)(3) for the purpose to consult with the county attorney in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege with the following individuals permitted to attend: County Manager Katherine Cathey, Clerk to the Board Michele Solomon, County Attorney T.C. Morphis, Jr., Health Director Janet Clayton, and Environmental Health Supervisor Bonnie Holt. CLOSED SESSION #2 A motion to enter into Closed Session #2 per General Statute 143-318.11(a)(4) for the purpose of discussion of matters relating to the location or expansion of industries or other businesses in the county related to economic development with the following individuals permitted to attend: County Manager Katherine Cathey, Clerk to the Board Michele Solomon, County Attorney T.C. Morphis, Jr., and Economic Development Director Brandy Lynch. Chairman Powell called the closed sessions to order at 7:18 p.m. A motion was made by Vice Chairman Sims and carried 5-0 to return to open session at 7:41 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: A motion was made by Commissioner Puryear and carried 5-0 to adjourn the meeting at 7:42 p.m. _____________________________ ______________________________ Michele Solomon Gordon Powell Clerk to the Board Chairman