Agenda Packet October 5 2015PERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING AGENDA
304 South Morgan Street, Room 215
Roxboro, NC 27573-5245
336-597-1720
Fax 336-599-1609
October 5, 2015
7:00pm
CALL TO ORDER…………………………………………………. Chairman Puryear
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF AGENDA
RECOGNITION:
ITEM #1
Proclamation National 4-H Week in Person County ……………. Chairman Puryear
INFORMAL COMMENTS
The Person County Board of Commissioners established a 10 minute segment
which is open for informal comments and/or questions from citizens of this
county on issues, other than those issues for which a public hearing has been
scheduled. The time will be divided equally among those wishing to comment.
It is requested that any person who wishes to address the Board, register with
the Clerk to the Board prior to the meeting.
ITEM #2
DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes of September 21, 2015,
B. Budget Amendment #6,
C. Budget Amendment #7, and
D. Budget Amendment #8
1
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
ITEM #3
Ordinance Requiring Connection to Water Lines ………………………. Ron Aycock
NEW BUSINESS:
ITEM #4
Structural Assessment of former Senior Center Building ……………….. Heidi York
ITEM #5
Appointment to the Nursing Home Advisory Committee …………… Brenda Reaves
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
MANAGER’S REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS/COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
Note: All Items on the Agenda are for Discussion and Action as deemed appropriate
by the Board.
2
Proclamation
National 4-H Week
Person County
October 4th-10th, 2015
Whereas, the youth of any community are its greatest natural resource; and,
Whereas, 4-H is the largest youth organization in North Carolina, with nearly one in every
8 North Carolina youth involved in 4-H; and,
Whereas, 4-H in North Carolina claims more than 200,000 youth members and 27,000
adult volunteers, while Person County’s 4-H program numbers 1,265 youth and 85
volunteers; and,
Whereas, 4-H addresses issues facing youth wherever they live—in inner cities, suburbs
and rural communities and helps break barriers by focusing on learning-by-doing; and,
Whereas, 4-H has programs on food and nutrition, science and technology, natural
resources, growing plants, caring for farm animals, career education, community pride,
citizenship and leadership; and,
Whereas, exciting, fun and student-centered educational programs are available through
county 4-H School Enrichment programs; and,
Whereas, 4-H as part of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service is a program
where youth learn together in all kinds of projects, events and activities;
Now Therefore, the Person County Board of Commissioners, do hereby proclaim October
4th-10th, 2015
National 4-H Week in Person County
And urge the people of this county to take advantage of the opportunity to become more
aware of this special program which gives youth the chance to learn together and to be a part
of Person County 4-H, and support the work of the 4-H Youth Development Program.
___________________________________________________________ ______________
Chairman, Person County Board of Commissioners Date
3
September 21, 2015
1
PERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SEPTEMBER 21, 2015
MEMBERS PRESENT OTHERS PRESENT
Kyle W. Puryear Heidi York, County Manager
David Newell, Sr.
B. Ray Jeffers Brenda B. Reaves, Clerk to the Board
Jimmy B. Clayton
Tracey L. Kendrick
The Board of Commissioners for the County of Person, North Carolina, met in
regular session on Monday, September 21, 2015 at 9:00am in the Commissioners’ meeting
room in the Person County Office Building.
Chairman Puryear called the meeting to order. Commissioner Kendrick gave an
invocation and Vice Chairman Newell led the group in the Pledge of Allegiance.
DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Commissioner Kendrick requested consideration to add an item to the agenda to
discuss Person County’s Ordinance requiring Connection to Water Lines.
A motion was made by Vice Chairman Newell and carried 5-0 to add an item to
the agenda to discuss Person County’s Ordinance requiring Connection to Water Lines and
to approve the agenda as adjusted.
RECOGNITION
PERSON COUNTY PREPAREDNESS MONTH 2015 PROCLAMATION:
It was the consensus of the Board for Chairman Puryear to read and present the
Preparedness Month 2015 Proclamation to Public Health Emergency Preparedness
Coordinator, Michelle White and Public Health Director, Janet Clayton.
4
September 21, 2015
2
5
September 21, 2015
3
INFORMAL COMMENTS:
The following individuals appeared before the Board to make informal comments:
Mr. Leigh Woodall of 200 Reade Drive, Roxboro stated to partner with Granville
County or any other county for solid waste disposal will be an expensive option. Mr.
Woodall stated Smith-Gardner was tasked to study and recommend the least costly option
to which he believed would be to renegotiate the current contract with Upper Piedmont.
Mr. Woodall told the group that the Local Government Commission houses data related to
solid waste expenses.
Ms. Betty A. Blalock of 144 Tirzah Ridge, Rougemont stated how the City of
Roxboro did not want to recycle but wanted the County to take their trash.
DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA:
A motion was made by Commissioner Kendrick and carried 5-0 to approve the
Consent Agenda with the following items:
A. Approval of Minutes of September 8, 2015,
B. Budget Amendment #4,
C. Budget Amendment #5,
D. Home and Community Care Block Grant for Older Adults Agreement for the
Provision of County-Based Aging Services by and between the County of Person
and Kerr Tar Agency on Aging,
E. Tax Adjustments for September 2015
a. Tax Releases
b. NC Vehicle Tax System pending refunds
c. Written request for refund by Ms. Ann Hobbs
NEW BUSINESS:
UPDATE ON THE PROPOSED EARLY COLLEGE INITIATIVE:
Commissioner Clayton requested for the Board to receive an update on the status
of the proposed early college initiative. After the Helena Steering Committee brought their
recommendations to the Board for the former Helena School site to become an early
college, an educational task force was formed and chaired by Piedmont Community
College (PCC) President, Dr. Walter Bartlett and Person County Schools (PCS)
Superintendent Dan Holloman. Commissioner Clayton noted the County owns and
maintains the former Helena School site and has located satellite offices for the Sheriff and
Emergency Services and the community desires the vacated school buildings to be in use.
6
September 21, 2015
4
Mr. Holloman updated the Board on the recent progress on the early college
initiative. Person Early College for Innovation and Leadership (PECIL) is an early college
high school established by PCS and PCC and is scheduled to open in the fall 2016. Its
purpose is to expand students’ opportunities for success by providing pathways toward
academic engagement, post-secondary education, and vital Science, Technology,
Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) careers. PECIL targets students who are at risk of
dropping out, whose parents did not continue education beyond high school, and who
would benefit from accelerated academic instruction. PECIL will be located on PCC’s
campus and will serve 50 freshmen in the first cohort, adding 50 more students each
subsequent year. A variety of unique educational opportunities will be incorporated into
the high school and college-level courses, such as mentorships with community business
partners, field trips to businesses and colleges, and service leadership initiatives. The
curriculum pathways have been designed in such a way that all students can graduate from
PECIL with a high school diploma and an associate degree in five years. Mr. Holloman
noted the student pathway options included: a) Health Science: Healthcare Management
Technology; b) Advanced Manufacturing: Electrical Power Production Technology;
Mechatronics; c) Technology: Computer Technology Integration; Digital Effects and
Animation Technology; and d) Transfer: Associate in Science.
Mr. Holloman credited the following industry partners for the PECIL: CertainTeed,
Duke Energy Progress, P&A Industrial Fabrications, and Person Memorial Hospital.
Mr. Holloman noted Person County was one of 20 counties that does not have an
early college high school program. Mr. Holloman stated PCC and PCS staff have applied
for start-up grant funding up to $400,000 noting there is a stipulation for the funding for
the early college high school be located on a college campus. Mr. Holloman noted that
lottery funding could not be used for this project due to the location was not on school
property. Mr. Holloman further noted the stringent timeline for staff to prepare the
application for the early college high school grant funding. Mr. Holloman told the group
that PCC and PCS are interested in pursuing use of the former Helena School building for
a middle school STEM magnet program in the future.
Commissioner Clayton stated the community around the former Helena School site
wants to see use of the old campus noting there has been inquiries to transform the site into
a new charter school.
Commissioner Jeffers asked Mr. Holloman if capital funding from the county
would be needed since lottery funds could not be used for the early college high school.
Mr. Holloman stated a doublewide mobile classroom is anticipated to be needed on the
PCC campus.
7
September 21, 2015
5
PRESENTATION OF FIRE AND RESCUE AUDIT RESULTS:
Finance Director, Amy Wehrenberg introduced Mr. James P. Winston II, CPA and
Mr. Alex Elliott with Winston, Williams, Creech, Evans & Company, LLP to present to
the Board the final audit results for all fire and rescue departments for Fiscal Year 2014.
Mr. Winston summarized the audit results with the following handouts.
8
September 21, 2015
6
Lack of Segregation of duties: No oversight by the fire and rescue board of directors.
Formal Approval: Moriah and Woodsdale have gone to a PO system subsequent to year end.
NC Sales and use tax refund: Recommend to file for refund for three years back to recoup tax.
Form 990 Filed: Allensville filed late, Timberlake filed late/in process and Ceffo is on extension.
9
September 21, 2015
7
*of Departments with debt.
Timberlake excluded from this chart. Timberlake not auditable at this point; $9,000 cash
in bank with debt owed, approximately $85,000 in alleged fraudulent transactions.
10
September 21, 2015
8
11
September 21, 2015
9
Mr. Elliott told the group that Winston, William, Creech and Evans, LLP will write
a management letter to each individual fire and rescue department listing specific
recommendations for their entity.
County Manager, Heidi York asked the auditors if Person County should be doing
anything differently related to disbursing funds to fire and rescue departments. Mr.
Winston suggested monitoring for greater board oversight and consider the affordability
for fire and rescue departments incurring new debt. Mr. Elliott stated the fire and rescue
departments should operate and sustain its debt without the county annual appropriation.
Commissioner Kendrick asked the County Manager if Person County could take
the auditor’s recommendation and make them a performance review for future funding.
Ms. York stated the County could revamp the fire funding contracts to base on performance
whereby certain criteria would be met prior to receiving the next fiscal year funding
allocation. Ms. York stated her and staff could work on amending the fire and rescue
service contracts should the Board desire to further discuss and approve such contract
changes.
ORDINANCE REQUIRING CONNECTION TO WATER LINES:
Commissioner Kendrick stated he added this item to the agenda for Board
discussion as a follow-up to a citizen’s complaint that he could not pull a well permit due
to the current ordinance in place. Commissioner Kendrick advocated for citizens to have
the option to dig their own well if so desired and recommended that the Board of
Commissioners consider repealing the Ordinance requiring Connection to Water Lines.
Commissioner Clayton stated understanding to the citizen’s complaint noting when
the ordinance was originally considered, the requirement for connection to water lines may
have been related to state and federal grant funding requirements as well as compliance
with plumbing code.
County Manager, Heidi York stated the Inspections Director was unable to find the
300 ft. requirement referenced in the current code.
A motion was made by Vice Chairman Newell and carried 5-0 to direct the County
Attorney to research the requirements as set out in the Ordinance requiring Connection to
Water Lines as well as the impacts for a repeal of said ordinance.
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT:
Chairman Puryear had no report.
12
September 21, 2015
10
MANAGER’S REPORT:
County Manager, Heidi York reminded the Board of the scheduled Solid Waste
Community Listening Session in the auditorium from 7:00pm-8:00pm this date. Ms. York
noted citizens could sign up to provide input to the consultants that are preparing the Solid
Waste Study. Based on the number of individuals that sign up, a time limit may be
imposed. Ms. York stated she would facilitate communicating the purpose of the meeting
as well as the process.
COMMISSIONER REPORT/COMMENTS:
There were no reports/comments given by Commissioners Jeffers, Clayton and
Kendrick or Vice Chairman Newell.
CLOSED SESSION #1
A motion was made by Commissioner Kendrick and carried 5-0 to enter Closed
Session per General Statute 143-318.11(a)(6) at 9:50am for the purpose to discuss
personnel with the following individuals permitted to attend: County Manager, Heidi York
and Clerk to the Board, Brenda Reaves.
A motion was made by Commissioner Kendrick and carried 5-0 to return to open
session at 10:15am.
A motion was made by Commissioner Jeffers and carried 5-0 to increase the
County Manager’s salary by 3% merit based on her annual performance evaluation.
ADJOURNMENT:
A motion was made by Commissioner Kendrick and carried 5-0 to adjourn the
meeting at 10:16am.
_____________________________ ______________________________
Brenda B. Reaves Kyle W. Puryear
Clerk to the Board Chairman
(Draft Board minutes are subject to Board approval).
13
10/5/2015
Dept./Acct No.Department Name Amount
Incr / (Decr)
EXPENDITURES CIP Project Fund
County Projects (1,017,985)
PCC Projects (180,000)
School Projects (869,783)
REVENUES CIP Project Fund
Transfer from General Fund (1,628,948)
Fund Balance Appropriation (438,820)
Explanation:
BUDGET AMENDMENT
Closing out CIP projects that were complete at June 30, 2015.
BA 6-CIP-closeout14
10/5/2015
Dept./Acct No.Department Name Amount
Incr / (Decr)
EXPENDITURES Community Development Block Grant Fund (400,000)
REVENUES Community Development Block Grant Fund
Intergovernmental Revenues (400,000)
Explanation:
BUDGET AMENDMENT
Closing out CDBG Project Fund that was complete at June 30, 2015.
BA 7-CDBG-closeout15
10/5/2015
Dept./Acct No.Department Name Amount
Incr / (Decr)
EXPENDITURES General Fund
General Government 780
Education 321,058
Human Services 254,643
Culture and Recreation 3,616
Debt Service 119,671
REVENUES General Fund
Intergovernmental 321,058
Other Revenues 1,280
Interfund Transfers 119,671
Fund Balance Appropriation 257,759
Explanation:
BUDGET AMENDMENT
Recognize wellness gym fees ($780); receipt of lottery funds for Person County Schools ($321,058);
carryforward of Kirby sound equipment commitment outstanding as of June 30, 2015 ($3,116); recognize
donation to Library ($500); DSS rollovers from FY15 ($254,643); move telephone and elections equipment
capital leases currently located in the CIP Fund to the Debt Service Fund (130) to reclassify costs from capital
to operating since the decision was made to finance these items, incorporating them as debt expense
($119,671).
BA-816
AGENDA ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: October 5, 2015
Agenda Title: Ordinance Requiring Connection to Water Lines
Summary of Information: At the Board’s September 21st Meeting, Commissioner Kendrick added
a discussion of the Ordinance Requiring Connection to Water Lines. He stated his desire to allow
property owners a choice to connect to a city water line or to dig a private well. To provide this
choice, the Ordinance would need to be repealed. The Commissioners directed the Manager and the
County Attorney to conduct some additional research on the requirements and impacts of this.
Recommended Action: Receive the information.
Submitted By: Heidi York, County Manager
17
18
19
20
AGENDA ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: October 5, 2015
Agenda Title: Structural Assessment of former Senior Center Building
Summary of Information:
The County has retained HH Architecture for the future senior center project. The first task in their
scope of work was to conduct a structural assessment of the former senior center building to
determine its condition for future use. The building was evaluated by Stroud Pence, Structural
Engineers and their report is included. Overall, their report confirms what the County Building
Inspector found previously; there are substantial structural and serviceability issues that require
repair.
In addition to the structural assessment, environmental assessments for air quality, asbestos, and
lead-based paint were also conducted.
Ms. Kristen Hess, of HH Architecture will present the findings of the reports. She has also been
asked to present a cost-benefit analysis comparing the renovation of the former structure with
demolition and new construction.
Recommended Action: Receive the reports and provide direction on whether the Board wants to
pursue renovation or demolition.
Submitted By: Heidi York, County Manager
21
Roger G. Stroud, P.E.
Edward W. Pence, Jr., P.E.
David W. Mykins, P.E.
John H. Hancock, P.E.
Earl H. Inge, Jr., P.E.
Jeffrey R. Morrison, P.E.
Wayne E. Beckingham, P.E.
Anna E. Lynch, P.E.
Christopher M. Geiman, P.E.
Antolin C. Dela Cruz, Jr.
Karen M. Tasch, CPSM
Preston G. Kalina
Diana P. Warren
Benjamin R. Walker, P.E.
(1932-2002)
RALEIGH
4904 Professional Court
Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.782.1833
VIRGINIA BEACH
Corporate Office
5032 Rouse Drive
Suite 200
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462
757.671.8626
GLEN ALLEN
4198 Cox Road
Suite 110
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
804.346.3935
NEW YORK
P.O. Box 308
Old Forge, New York 13420
315.369.1004
www.stroudpence.com
Building Construction
The building is a three-story wood framed structure built on a crawlspace
foundation. All observations are given from the perspective of a person facing
the main entrance of the building.
The main entrance to the building is located at the second elevated floor of the
structure. This level of the building houses office space and a common area that
was previously utilized as assembly space. The basement level is located below
the main level and is below grade on the south side of the building. The
basement level houses exercise equipment on the west side of the building as
well as another large common area. The third floor of the structure is unfinished
attic space and currently serves as storage space for the facility.
The crawlspace, basement and main level are supported by 8x8 nominal timber
columns spaced at 12’-0” on center in both directions. The attic and roof are
supported by columns spaced at 24’-0” on center in the north-south direction and
12’-0” on center east-west. The wood girders span north-south along the column
lines with the floor and roof joists running east-west between the girders. The
floor framing varies within each floor but typically consist of 2x10s spaced 16”-20”
on center. The roof framing consist of rough cut 2x6 joists as 16”-20” on center.
The exterior walls of the building consist triple and four wythe brick.
OBSERVATIONS
The roof structure was completely exposed and widespread visible deflection
was noted at all of the girders. In some locations, the roof joists were no longer
physically attached to the girders due to severe deflection. We observed
September 18, 2015
Kristen Hess, AIA
HH Architecture
520 S. Harrington Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
SPA Project No: R15.117
Dear Ms. Hess,
As you requested, and in accordance with our contract dated August 7, 2015, we
visited the site of the existing building located in downtown Roxboro, North
Carolina on September 1, 2015. The purpose of this visit was to observe the
general structural condition of the existing building. This report summarizes our
findings.
22
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 2 of 15
checking in some of the girders and two locations where a compression failure
crack had developed in the girder indicating a structural failure.
Supplementary cross bracing had been installed at one of the columns in an
effort to provide additional support to one the roof girders in the southeast section
of the attic space. The supported girder had visibly deflected vertically and
laterally out of plane. An adjustable jack post had been installed in the northwest
section of the attic also to presumably reduce roof deflections.
The roof joists displayed significant deflection and we observed two locations
where the roof joists had developed compression failure cracks.
A structural analysis of the roof girders and roof joists was performed to
determine the capacity of the members. Based on current code design
requirements, the roof joists are adequate for the design loads; however, they
are still displaying a significant amount of deflection due to long-term creep and
some structural failures were observed as noted. The roof girders are not
structurally adequate for the presumed roof loading which is evident by the
physical distress and deflections noted in these members.
Additional damages noted in the attic floor include a section of flooring that had
been replaced and isolated cracking in the exterior wall on the northeast corner
of the wall.
The most common deficiency noted on the main level was severe floor
deflections. Relative elevations taken in various spots on the main level
indicated that at the center of the column bays the floor was as much as 5” lower
than at the perimeter walls and over the columns. This deflection is evident upon
entering the structure through the main entrance.
A structural analysis of this floor system indicated that the floor joists are
adequate for a typical office type live load of 50 psf, however, the joists are not
adequate for an assembly type floor load of 100 psf. Based on our knowledge of
the use of the building, it is likely that the floor has experienced more assembly
type loads since this space was used for gatherings and group exercise.
A similar analysis was run for the floor girders which are also adequate for typical
floor live loads of 50 psf but are not structurally adequate for assembly live loads.
Additional structural deficiencies at this floor included sagging of the steel lintels
over the exterior windows. The lintels consisted of multiple steel plates spanning
over the windows. This deficiency was noted at all levels except the attic.
The basement floor of the structure had sustained significant mold damage due
to water intrusion on the north side of the building. The ceiling framing and
decking on the north side of the structure just east of the exercise equipment
room had significant mold growth on the surface as well as the drywall. A further
indication of water intrusion was the laminate tile peeling up from the floor on the
north side of the building.
23
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 3 of 15
Deflection was noted in the floor at this level; however it was not as severe as the
floor above. It was noted that the ceilings on this floor were extremely low which
we understand causes some difficulty in effectively using the space.
The crawlspace framing displayed isolated structural deficiencies similar to those
noted at the other floors. We observed a floor joist that had cracked indicating a
structural failure. Several of the floor framing members below the damaged tile
observed at the floor above had significant mold growth.
Evidence of previous wood eating organisms was also observed on many of the
floor framing members. Insect tunnels were noted and much of floor framing
around this area appeared damaged.
The timber columns in the crawlspace were supported on cast-in-place concrete
footings. At one location, we observed a column that was damaged such that it
was narrower at the base indicating a loss on structural section properties.
Another column was bearing on the edge of the supporting concrete footing and
an additional column was bearing on a footing that was approximately only 6”
wider than the actual column.
The last two rows of building framing were supported by brick piers at the
foundation level. At one pier location, timber columns had been installed
adjacent to the pier on a stack of timber beams presumably to address a
structural support issue.
In addition to mold, we observed significant efflorescence on the brick piers and
walls indicating long-term exposure to water.
The perimeter walls of the building were in good physical condition with only
minor cracking noted in the walls at the attic floor.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The building has several substantial structural and serviceability issues that
require repair. All of the roof girders require repair or replacement so that they
are structurally adequate for the design loads and meet acceptable deflections
criteria. The roof joists that are cracked and damaged also require replacement.
The floor decking is in moderate condition and other than the damaged area
noted, does not require repair.
The deflection observed at the main level is both a structural and serviceability
issue. The severe deflection in the floor framing is due to a combination of
overloading of the floor and deflection due to long-term creep in the wood. Due
to the use of the building, the deflection is a safety concern to the patrons and
may result in tripping and falling. In addition to the deflection of the main level
floor, as noted previously, the floor framing is not adequate for assembly type
loads that are more appropriate for the common are of the main floor. In order to
address both the deflection and strength issues in the floor framing, the framing
would need to be completely replaced at this level. The steel lintels at all levels
would also require replacement.
The damaged and molded framing in the crawlspace would need to be repaired
or replaced. The damaged timber column requires repair and supplemental
24
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 4 of 15
footings need to be installed at locations where the existing column footings are
not adequate.
In order to prevent further molding and rotting of the wood framing, the water
intrusion issue on the north side of the structure must be addressed. This may
require new waterproofing below grade as well repairs to the window assemblies
on the north side of the structure.
It is our opinion that the repair of the existing structure is possible, however, the
degree of repair and replacement required to address the structural issues will be
extremely costly as there are many areas that require complete replacement of
the structural framing. Additionally, it is our understanding that the current
spaces are inherently challenging to use due to tight column spacing and low
ceiling heights. Repairs made to the existing structure would utilize the currently
column grid and floor to floor height, and as such, these concerns would not be
addressed.
LIMITATIONS
The professional services for this limited structural evaluation and report have
been performed, the findings obtained, and the conclusions drawn in
accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. The
scope of this investigation and report is limited to the structural issue identified.
Stroud, Pence & Associates, Ltd. is not responsible for the conclusions,
opinions, or recommendations made by others, based on the data presented in
this letter. The conclusions contained herein are based solely on the
information obtained during the limited visual observation and represent only a
professional opinion based on this information and past experience with similar
conditions.
Sincerely,
STROUD, PENCE & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Collette Ramirez, P.E.
Structural Engineer
cr
25
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 5 of 15
Photos
Photo 1: South Building Elevation
Photo 2: East Building Elevation
26
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 6 of 15
Photo 3: Building North Elevation
Photo 4: Deflected Girder with Temporary Repair
27
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 7 of 15
Photo 5: Girder Compression Crack
Photo 6: Cracked Roof Joist
28
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 8 of 15
Photo 7: Temporary Post Repair at Roof
Photo 8: Deflected Roof Joists and Girders
29
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 9 of 15
Photo 9: Damaged Attic Floor Deck
Photo 10: Water Damaged Roof Decking
30
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 10 of 15
Photo 11: Brick Crack in Attic Wall
Photo 12: Floor Deflection on Main Floor
31
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 11 of 15
Photo 13: Deflected Window Lintels
Photo 14: Water Damage in Basement Level
32
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 12 of 15
Photo 15: Water Damaged Ceiling Framing in Basement
Photo 16: Mold in Basement Fitness Area
33
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 13 of 15
Photo 17: Damaged Crawlspace Column
Photo 18: Damaged Joists from Wood-Eating Organisms
34
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 14 of 15
Photo 19: Cracked Floor Joist in Crawlspace
Photo 20: Water Damaged Floor Deck - Crawlspace
35
Kristen Hess, AIA
September 18, 2015
Person County Senior Center Conditions Assessment
Page 15 of 15
Photo 21: Crawlspace Column on Edge of Footing
Photo 22: Temporary Brick Pier Support in Crawlspace
36
37
38