05-03-2021 Closed Session Meeting Minutes BOCMay 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 1 of 15
Person County Board of Commissioners
Minutes of a Closed Session
DATE: May 3, 2021
MEMBERS OF BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
Chairman Powell,
Vice Chairman Puryear,
Commissioner Gentry,
Commissioner Palmer, and
Commissioner Sims
OTHERS PRESENT:
County Manager, Heidi York,
Clerk to the Board, Brenda Reaves,
County Attorney, Ellis Hankins,
Economic Development Director, Sherry Wilborn, and
Jordan Jones of UNC School of Government Development Finance Initiative
CLOSED SESSION #1
A motion was made by Commissioner Sims and carried 5-0 to enter into Closed Session
at 9:53pm per General Statute 143-318.11(a)(4) for the purpose of discussion of matters relating to
the location or expansion of industries or other businesses in the county (economic development)
with the following individuals permitted to attend: County Manager, Heidi York, Clerk to the
Board, Brenda Reaves, Economic Development Director, Sherry Wilborn, County Attorney, Ellis
Hankins, Jordan Jones, UNC School of Government Development Finance Initiative and Economic
Development Commission Chairman, Phillip Allen.
Chairman Powell called the Closed Session #1 to order at 9:55pm. Economic Development
Director, Sherry Wilborn introduced Jordan Jones from the UNC School of Government
Development Finance Initiative who also presented to the Economic Development Commission
(EDC) at its April meeting along with his cohort, Emily Bailey. Ms. Wilborn stated both Mr. Jones
and Ms. Bailey assisted the EDC with the Request for Proposals (RFP) solicitation for the North
Park site shell building and the evaluation of the two proposals submitted. Ms. Wilborn said one
of the two proposals was a build to suit proposal and the other proposal had an incomplete budget;
a counter proposal may be in order.
Ms. Wilborn stated three commissioners were present at the April EDC meeting and were
included in the closed session presentation by Mr. Jones. She added she would share the EDC
recommendation to the Board at the end of Mr. Jones’ presentation.
Mr. Jones stated he works as a development advisor assisting local governments on
economic development projects specifically public private partnerships, downtown revitalization
efforts and overall master planning of communities. Mr. Jones said he could provide context and
information about the RFP, local market data and comparison between the proposals received.
Mr. Jones shared the following presentation:
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 2 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 3 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 4 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 5 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 6 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 7 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 8 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 9 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 10 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 11 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 12 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 13 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 14 of 15
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #1 Page 15 of 15
County Manager, Heidi York stated she found it interesting that the County could build
cheaper than being privately developed.
Ms. Wilborn told the group that the EDC had the following recommendations:
Proceed with a County RFQ for clearing and grading the site to be pad ready and marketing
it for virtual building for a build to suit tenant,
County to consider pursuing the construction manager at risk route, and/or
Obtain estimates for the clearing and grading.
Ms. Wilborn stated she had not prepared a RFP for the clearing and grading however, she
obtained a local quote for the 8-acre site plan/footprint at $2.35M.
Commissioner Gentry noted that as a government entity, the project would have to be bid
out and questioned if the county had staff to manage such processes.
County Attorney, Ellis Hankins stated there is statutory authority for counties to build shell
buildings with the expectation of exercising the bidding procurement process. Ms. Wilborn added
the public process also included going through the Local Government Commission for approval.
EDC Chairman, Phillip Allen reiterated the fact that the County has no product noting the
County would have to make an investment with the risk of not having a return; same scenario even
if the county had funds to readily invest. He added because of the risks, the County was back to the
starting point of having no product.
Commissioner Sims asked if there were any other investments planned to consider. Mr.
Allen stated there was many things needed to be done and the County should diversify.
Ms. Wilborn stated the first step would be to acquire property so that clearing and grading
could take place to make it more attractive noting the topography and wetlands provided some
challenges, as the assumption to a tenant is that the property would be conveyed. Ms. Wilborn said
she reached out to Piedmont Electric regarding their revolving loan program through USDA and
they have a capacity of $1.3M at a 1% interest rate.
Mr. Jones summarized the development costs at $4.9M with a $2.8M delta (where market
price is today versus total development costs) plus $2.35M for the grading/clearing for a projected
cost of $7.2M.
Everyone noted the risks were huge and timing was bad with construction costs increasing
without a guarantee of a tenant. Commissioner Gentry suggested continuing to explore options,
keep searching and see what happens in the marketplace.
The Board accepted the update without a consensus or any direction to staff at this time.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gentry and carried 5-0 to return to open session at
10:34pm.
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #2 Page 1 of 2
Person County Board of Commissioners
Minutes of a Closed Session
DATE: May 3, 2021
MEMBERS OF BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
Chairman Powell,
Vice Chairman Puryear,
Commissioner Gentry,
Commissioner Palmer, and
Commissioner Sims
OTHERS PRESENT:
County Manager, Heidi York,
Clerk to the Board, Brenda Reaves,
County Attorney, Ellis Hankins, and
Economic Development Director, Sherry Wilborn
CLOSED SESSION #2
A motion was made by Commissioner Gentry and carried 5-0 to enter into Closed Session at
10:36pm per General Statute 143-318.11(a)(4) for the purpose of discussion of matters relating to
the location or expansion of industries or other businesses in the area served by the public body,
including agreement on a tentative list of economic development incentives that may be offered by
the public body in negotiations with the following individuals permitted to attend: County
Manager, Heidi York, Clerk to the Board, Brenda Reaves, Economic Development Director, Sherry
Wilborn and County Attorney, Ellis Hankins.
Chairman Powell called the Closed Session #2 to order at 10:37pm. Economic
Development Director, Sherry Wilborn stated the purpose of Closed Session #2 was to review
financial incentives for Project Famous. Ms. Wilborn proposed financial incentives for Project
Famous in April to which the Board consented to $1,522,331.37 grant over a 10-year period. Ms.
Wilborn explained Project Famous requested reconsideration noting that in April, the average wage
was projected to be $47,120 and now was being modified to $51,487 based on a 3% multiplier.
Ms. Wilborn provided the Board with a handout illustrating a revised 10-year grant that
totaled $1,899,096.32. Ms. Wilborn reminded the Board that the new capital investment is $61M
with 300 pledged jobs. Ms. Wilborn noted the state of NC was not revising its financial incentives
and they included $3M with an additional $1M (CDBG Building Reuse Grant). Ms. Wilborn
further noted this would make them the second largest private sector employer with the largest
footprint of industrial space.
In addition, Ms. Wilborn advised the Board that this company had a late personal property
filing for 2020, which means they will have a penalty. She said the Tax Administrator has estimated
the penalty to be around $11,000.
May 3, 2021, Closed Session #2 Page 2 of 2
Ms. Wilborn asked the Board to consider her proposal of increasing the financial incentives
for Project Famous based on the new information and making it contingent that the company does
not appeal its penalty with the Board of Commissioners noting the agreement would be written so
that they would not have the ability to appeal a late listing penalty.
To summarize the new financial incentives proposed, Ms. Wilborn said over a 10-year
period, the County would offer $1.9M and not the previously consented $1.5M with the
understanding the company would not appeal the late listing penalty or at any future time while
under the financial incentives agreement. County Attorney, Ellis Hankins said that typical
provisions in a financial incentives agreement is that the company complies with all applicable laws
that includes paying its taxes.
The Board consented to the revised financial incentives, as proposed by the Economic
Development Director at $1,899,096.32.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gentry and carried 5-0 to return to open session at
10:50pm.