04-06-2026 Meeting Minutes BOCApril 6, 2026
1
PERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS April 6, 2026
MEMBERS PRESENT OTHERS PRESENT
Kyle Puryear Katherine M. Cathey, County Manager
Sherry Wilborn Michele Solomon, Clerk to the Board
Jason Thomas T.C. Morphis, Jr., County Attorney
Antoinetta Royster
Donald Long
The Board of Commissioners for the County of Person, North Carolina, met in
Regular session on Monday, April 6, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. in the Auditorium of the Person
County Office Building located at 304 S. Morgan Street, Roxboro, NC.
Chairman Puryear called the meeting to order and recognized a quorum was present.
Commissioner Thomas offered an invocation, and Commissioner Royster led the group in
the Pledge of Allegiance.
DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Wilborn and carried 5-0 to approve the
agenda.
PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING APRIL AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM CHILD
ADVOCATE APPRECIATION MONTH
Assistant County Manager/Human Services Director Brian Hart read a
Proclamation Recognizing April as Guardian ad Litem Child Advocate Appreciation Month
in Person County. Guardian ad Litems in attendance were invited to rise and receive
recognition of the Board and all present.
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Wilborn and carried 5-0 to approve a
Proclamation recognizing April as Guardian-ad-Litem Child Advocate Appreciation
Month.
April 6, 2026
2
April 6, 2026
3
PUBLIC HEARING:
TEXT AMENDMENT TA-07-25, REVISED, FOR ADOPTION OF THE
AMENDMENTS TO THE SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM ORDINANCE
A motion was made Vice-Chair Wilborn and carried 5-0 to open the duly
advertised public hearing for Text Amendment TA-07-25, Revised, for Adoption of
the Amendments to the Solar Energy System Ordinance.
Planning Director Nish Trivedi presented the following:
April 6, 2026
4
April 6, 2026
5
There were no questions by the Board for Trivedi at this time.
April 6, 2026
6
Catherine Hill, an attorney with Smith Anderson, on behalf of Hyco Solar, LLC, presented
the following:
April 6, 2026
7
April 6, 2026
8
April 6, 2026
9
April 6, 2026
10
April 6, 2026
11
April 6, 2026
12
April 6, 2026
13
Harrison Cole, Associate Director with Cypress Creek Renewables, provided the
following information:
Background:
o Pre-2017 saw numerous small-scale solar projects statewide; House Bill 951
(2017) created a new framework, shifting to RFP processes and least-cost
additions starting in 2022.
For independent power producers:
o 80 MW AC is the state maximum for selling directly to the utility; projects
above 80 MW must be utility-owned (Duke Energy).
Grid & Transmission Constraints:
o Network upgrades are costly and born by the developer.
o Transmission capacity (analogy: “water pipe”) limits number/size of
projects; typically, 2–3 large projects per county (without major upgrades).
Community Outreach:
o Multiple local information sessions held; ongoing education (including tours
of existing Perkins Lane facility in Roxboro).
o Community support cited: booster clubs, Person County Museum, Veterans
Council (The Wall That Heals event), etc.
Economic/Tax Impacts:
o Estimated $7M in taxes paid over life of a Level 4 project (~$175K/year
average); rollback taxes paid when agricultural deferment ends.
Agrivoltaics & Local Jobs:
o Sheep grazing partnerships (including local operators); hiring preference for
local technicians (managed by Person County native Andy Clack).
Safety/Decommissioning:
o State law requires decommissioning bonds (county or NCDEQ
administration).
o Modern panels: minimal lead content; no leaching under normal conditions;
noise limited to inverters, typically inaudible at the fence line (50–100 feet).
April 6, 2026
14
Board Questions:
Vice-Chair Wilborn asked is the maximum cap 80 MW. Cole stated that 80 MW is
the state maximum for selling directly to the utility and that projects above 80 MW must be
utility-owned.
Commissioner Long asked Trivedi if multiple contiguous parcels under separate
ownership could be recombined to reach the >100-acre threshold. Trivedi stated that yes,
parcels can be recombined and that the single owner/applicant would apply after
recombination. Long also mentioned changing the language in Sections 2.6(B) and 2.6(D),
asking about changing “may” to “shall” (require restoration to original condition and
include a performance bond). Trivedi stated that yes, those changes can be made if the Board
chooses to amend the language. Long asked how the County would enforce any new and
existing rules. Trivedi stated that Level 4 conditions must be equal or more stringent than
baseline standards and would require Conditional Rezoning as explained earlier. Long asked
if battery storage could be included, and what about thermal runway incidents in lithium-
ion systems. Trivedi stated that battery language wasn’t changed and that any battery storage
would need project-specific approval with conditions.
Mike Storch, Manager of External Affairs with Cypress Creek Renewables stated
that they have not experienced incidents in their portfolio and that facilities are live electrical
systems meeting NEC standards. He stated that sites are securely fenced, have 24/7/365
monitoring via Cypress Creek Renewables’ Durham control center, and crews follow strict
call-in/call-out safety protocols. Long cited Cypress Creek Renewables’ social media
claiming Person County residents pay among the highest utility bills (even higher than
Hawaii) and projecting a 16% rate reduction. Cole stated that he is not familiar with those
statements, such claims were not on Cypress Creek Renewables’ official Hyco Solar
Facebook page/newsletter, and that only official channels should be considered
authoritative.
Commissioner Royster asked Cole what are the benefits when it comes to jobs and
to the community as a whole. Cole stated that these size projects have only a handful of full-
time positions once the project is built; however, during construction, which typically lasts
ten to twelve months, there is an average of 150-200 people employed dependent upon the
size of the project. He stated in reference to benefiting the community, he has seen from
experience, that it increases the overall tax budget. Royster had questions related to safety
and operations. Cole stated that all of the facilities are monitored out of the Durham control
center, which is manned, 24/7/365.
April 6, 2026
15
Vice-Chair Wilborn stated that since HB951 was passed, she got a report from the
Planning Department, and it reports only residential applications. She asked Cole would he
say that this Level 3, 10-100 acre is pretty much obsolete now. Cole stated that under the
current HB951, that no developer is able to submit a project that would be under 100 acres
as the minimum size for this part of the state, Duke Energy Progress requires a 50 MW
minimum threshold, which 100 acres does not meet.
Chairman Puryear asked if Cypress Creek Renewables hired vendors to spoof local
numbers and call commissioners, impersonating Person County residents.
Cole stated that a vendor did this about a year ago and that Cypress Creek Renewables
immediately stopped the practice. He apologized and stated it’s not acceptable engagement.
The following individuals appeared before the Board to speak in favor of Text
Amendment TA-07-25, Revised, for Adoption of the Amendments to the Solar Energy
System Ordinance:
Randall Thompson of 439 Van Thomas Drive, Raleigh stated that he is the brother of
landowner/applicant; emphasized landowner rights and tax base increase, and stated that
solar improves county revenues without burdening services.
Harold Henderson of 512 Qual Roost Drive, Semora shared experience losing farm
land to suburban growth, and stated that solar provides a way to protect family land and
support future generations.
Bob Brauer, Chair of the Person County Environmental Advisory Committee, stated
that he is speaking on behalf of the committee. He stated that the committee supported
Level 4 via conditional rezoning, noting location constraints (transmission, minimum 50
MW needs ~350 acres of panels) and the Board’s ability to impose site-specific
conditions.
Bryan Loomis of Strategic Economic Research, contracted by Cypress Creek
Renewables, projected local impacts: 67 construction jobs, 6+ long-term jobs, $3.9M local
earnings during construction, $263K/year in local earnings during operations; ~$7.5M in
property taxes over 40 years (front-loaded due to rollback).
Johnny Rogers of 945 Woodsdale Road, Roxboro stated that he and his spouse Sharon
Rogers own Rogers Cattle Company. He stated that he and his spouse are early adopters
of agrivoltaics (sheep grazing under solar); highlighted regenerative grazing, soil health,
and agricultural co-use benefits.
April 6, 2026
16
Sidney Thompson of 1431 Barker Road, Milton stated that he is the property
owner/applicant. He cited economic volatility in farming (costs, labor) and need to
preserve family land while contributing tax value without county resource strain.
Julie Nye of 407 River Trace Drive, Rougemont urged passage to allow case-by-
case review. She cited NC State Agrivoltaics research and cattle heat-stress reduction
benefits. She submitted a 103-signature petition supporting the amendment.
Carol Truby of 440 Moss Creek Drive, Roxboro noted Person County’s role as an
energy hub due to coal, gas, and renewables. She supported amending the ordinance now
to shape future projects. She stated that she trusts the process and the Thompson family’s
stewardship.
Karolyn Mangeot of 112 Elderberry Lane, Rougemont stated that the amendment
aligns with economic development while preserving rural character. She praised robust
review process and conditional zoning safeguards.
Vonda Frantz of 98 Elderberry Lane, Rougemont listed environmental and policy
reasons supporting renewables (air quality, efficient sun-days, tax base), with conditions
to ameliorate impacts.
Janna Kisner of 200 Semora Road, Roxboro cited evolving solar industry, tax
benefits, diversified energy sources, and quality of Cypress Creek Renewables
operations/site visit experience. She emphasized the “Progress is our Business” motto for
the City of Roxboro.
Anita Charnaker of 194 Moss Creek Drive, Roxboro shared personal experience
with a utility company cutting down her crepe myrtle trees. She stated that she supports
solar as cost-free sun energy.
Susan Jacques of 546 Lockamy Road, Roxboro stated that she is a local solar and
battery owner. She reported safe operation and that she supports agrivoltaics. She noted
Cypress Creek Renewables community engagement.
James Posig of 977 Black Wolfe Road, Semora stated that he is an adjacent
landowner (borders Thompson property on 3 sides). He stated that he supports his
neighbor’s land use rights. He cited local demand for power with minimal adverse impact
of solar.
April 6, 2026
17
Jay Poindexter of 9195 McGhees Mill Road, Semora stated that he supported
growth balanced with low-population areas. He argued solar preferable to high-density
residential expansion.
Kim Wooten of 632 Whitt Town Road, Roxboro stated that she is a PE Electrical
Engineer and that she supports ordinance flexibility with growth limits. She cautioned
against lithium-ion but noted other chemistries exist. She recommended controls to
maintain county identity.
Mike Hawkins of 181 Stonegate Drive, Roxboro stated that he is a farmer and
emphasized innovation and not being left behind. He urged passing of the amendment to
the ordinance.
Kendra Coggins of 256 Tanglewood Circle, Roxboro framed solar as local
investment. She asked the Board to consider redirecting resources to Parks, Arts, and
Community life. She noted Leandro decision’s funding implications and urged new
revenue sources.
The following individuals appeared before the Board to speak in opposition of
Text Amendment TA-07-25, Revised, for Adoption of the Amendments to the Solar
Energy System Ordinance:
Everett Titus representing Louisiana Pacific (LP), stated that LP Roxboro employs
~160; supports ~500 jobs in logging/transport via ~45 suppliers. He urged retaining the
100-acre cap to avoid permanent removal of working forests with long-term
environmental and economic value.
Ray Foushee of 8930 Hurdle Mills Road, Hurdle Mills cited public sentiment
against mega-solar. He emphasized the 2022 ordinance intent and alignment with the
Farmland Preservation Ordinance (August 2024). He stated Level 4 brings few jobs and
risks county-wide proliferation along transmission lines.
Claudia Berryhill of 279 Knolls of Hyco, Roxboro emphasized farmland
protection, rural beauty, and health/safety goals. She warned that >560 acres may be
needed for 80 MW and questioned agrivoltaic claims. She encouraged county incentives
to keep farms in agriculture.
April 6, 2026
18
Hunter Thomas, Chair of the Ag Advisory Board, stated that he is speaking on
behalf of the Advisory Board, expressed concerns as follows: Displacement of
farms/forestry, stormwater runoff/erosion (referencing Virginia Tech preliminary reports),
habitat loss, and limited economic markets for sheep; concluded Level 4 conflicts with
Guiding Principle #1 (celebrating rural character) and Farmland Preservation Plan.
Cynthia Lynch of 395 Union Grove Church Road, Hurdle Mills stated that she is a
Planning Board member. She cautioned about conditional zoning legal risks
(arbitrary/capricious claims). She noted that the county already allows many farm income
supplements. She highlighted that land use regulations exist precisely to balance
individual rights and community impacts.
Paul Lynch of 395 Union Grove Church Road, Hurdle Mills noted Person
County’s existing ~5,000 MW (coal/gas, MEC, pipelines) mostly exported south. He
argued an ~800-acre solar project adds only ~1% on a sunny day. He disputed claims that
solar reduces bills (cited higher rates in states with higher solar proportions). He warned
against covering thousands of acres in panels.
Anthony Horton of 7233 Hurdle Mills Road, Hurdle Mills raised aesthetic/cleanup
responsibility concerns during severe weather (e.g., tornado damage and debris). He
questioned stormwater impacts (e.g., heavy rain events).
PJ Gentry of 541 Byrd Creek, Hurdle Mills stated that she is a former
commissioner. She presented tornado photos (Indiana, Florida; Australia example) of
4,000 acres damaged. She questioned insurance adequacy and cleanup. She urged recusals
where conflicts exist.
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Wilborn and carried 5-0 to close the duly
advertised public hearing for Text Amendment TA-07-25, Revised, for Adoption of
the Amendments to the Solar Energy System Ordinance.
April 6, 2026
19
CONSIDERATION TO GRANT OR DENY TEXT AMENDMENT TA-07-25,
REVISED, FOR ADOPTION OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE SOLAR ENERGY
SYSTEM ORDINANCE
Commissioner Royster emphasized that the Board is not approving any project at this
time. She stated that she supports this ordinance and is in favor of the text amendment. She
stated that the world is changing around us and that Person County needs to embrace it and
be ready for it. She reminded the Board that there would only be a few that would have a
minimum of 350 acres.
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Wilborn to approve TA-07-25, to adopt the
amendments to the Solar Energy Systems ordinance, and find it consistent with the adopted
Person County & City of Roxboro Joint Comprehensive Land Use Plan, specifically,
Guiding Principle 1: Celebrating Our Rural Character, Objective 1.4: Support the
diversification of agricultural-related activity to strengthen the financial position and long-
term viability of farming, and Guiding Principle 2: Facilitating Sustainable Economic
Growth, Objective 2.7. Provide utility infrastructure to support sustainable economic
growth.
Vice-Chair Wilborn stated that conditional district rezoning provides full case-by-case
discretion; no project is entitled to approval. She stated that the 2022 cap of 100 acres is
now obsolete under current utility procurement and that Level 4 enables modern-scale
projects to be considered, not approved by default. She noted that natural constraints
(transmission proximity, 350+ acres contiguity, 200-ft setbacks, 150-ft vegetative buffers,
1-mile separation from other Level 3/4 projects, airport considerations, decommissioning
bond at 1.25× cost, etc.) minimize widespread siting; estimates of 2–3 large projects
countywide without major transmission upgrades. She stated that Agrivoltaics can preserve
agricultural character and/or provide increased tax value, depending on co-use and
enrollment in agricultural present-use valuation. She noted LP’s request for a “balanced
path”.
Chairman Puryear stated that in 2022, discussions started in reference to the Solar
Ordinance, which at that time yielded a 5-0 vote. He stated that he is not against solar panels,
that he just wants to keep restrictions in place, and is opposed to the text amendment.
Commissioner Thomas stated that since he has been on the Board, this has been the
hardest Public Hearing. He stated that he understands land-owner rights, and he is terrified
that if approved, that there would be lots of solar farms all across the County.
April 6, 2026
20
Commissioner Long asked if one Level 4 project is approved and a similar one is
denied, does that create illegal spot zoning risk. County Attorney T.C. Morphis, Jr. stated
that the likelihood is very low, and that conditional district rezonings are legislative and
site-specific. He stated that the largest NC spot-zoning case struck down was ~50 acres,
and that projects 350+ acres are unlikely to meet illegal spot zoning criteria.
A substitute motion was made by Commissioner Long that proposed amending
the ordinance text as follows:
§2.6(B): Replace “restoration to less than original condition is acceptable if
requested in writing by the parcel owners” with “must be restored to the original
condition as required, without exception.”
§2.6(D): Replace “may” with “shall,” to require inclusion of a performance bond.
After review of procedural guidance from Clerk to the Board Michele Solomon, and
County Attorney T.C. Morphis, Jr, Commissioner Long withdrew the substitute motion,
returning to consideration of the main motion.
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Wilborn to approve TA-07-25, which failed to
carry 3-2, to adopt the amendments to the Solar Energy Systems ordinance, and find it
consistent with the adopted Person County & City of Roxboro Joint Comprehensive Land
Use Plan, specifically, Guiding Principle 1: Celebrating Our Rural Character, Objective 1.4:
Support the diversification of agricultural-related activity to strengthen the financial
position and long-term viability of farming, and Guiding Principle 2: Facilitating
Sustainable Economic Growth, Objective 2.7. Provide utility infrastructure to support
sustainable economic growth. Chairman Puryear, Commissioner Thomas, and
Commissioner Long voted in opposition.
Chairman Puryear called a recess at 8:37 p.m., and the meeting reconvened at
8:42 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING:
TEXT AMENDMENT TA-01-26- PLANNING ORDINANCE CONSOLIDATION
A motion was made Commissioner Long and carried 5-0 to open the duly
advertised public hearing for Text Amendment TA 01-26 – Planning Ordinance
Consolidation.
A motion was made by Commissioner Long and carried 5-0 to table this Public
Hearing to the next scheduled Board meeting on April 20, 2026.
April 6, 2026
21
Related to Text Amendment TA-07-25, County Attorney T.C. Morphis, Jr.
reminded the Board that G.S. 160D-605(a) requires the Board to approve a comprehensive
plan consistency statement when approving or rejecting a zoning text amendment. Upon
this advice, Chairman Puryear asked the Board if it wished to adopt a resolution regarding
comprehensive plan consistency for the proposed solar text amendment it had just
considered. As a formality and to ensure compliance with statutes, Vice- Chair Wilborn
made a motion to that effect, and the Board voted 5-0 to approve the sample statement
provided by the Planning Staff in the meeting agenda packet which finds that the proposed
text amendment is inconsistent with the Adopted Person County & City of Roxboro Joint
Comprehensive Land Use Plan because it does not support any of the Guiding Principles
in the document.
INFORMAL COMMENTS:
The following individual appeared before the Board to make informal comments.
John Hill, Recreation, Arts, and Parks Director asked the Board and the
community to keep Mark Ashley and his family in their thoughts following his passing.
He noted Mr. Ashley’s 17 years of service, his leadership at Mayo Park/Mayo Lake, and
his impact on youth programs, tourism, and the Kirby Theater partnership. He expressed
interest in considering a naming honor at Mayo Lake Park in recognition of Mr. Ashley’s
service, consistent with existing naming practices.
Chairman Puryear directed staff to bring back a formal recognition/naming item at
a future meeting.
DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA:
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Wilborn and carried 5-0 to approve the
Consent Agenda with the following items:
A. March 16, 2026, Minutes
B. Budget Amendment # 16
April 6, 2026
22
NEW BUSINESS:
DONATION AND REQUEST FOR NAMING RIGHTS FOR CENTENNIAL
PARK TRAILS
Recreation, Arts, and Parks Director John Hill stated that Centennial Park
(formerly County Farm Park) trail-building effort have progressed, driven by local
volunteers and the Triangle Off-Road Cyclists (TORC). He stated that approximately ~6
miles of walking trail have been built; multi-use access (including emergency services)
could extend usable trail mileage to ~10 miles. He stated that TORC leadership and local
volunteers have contributed an estimated $190,080 in trail value (market rate approx.
$5/linear foot). He stated that TORC offered a donation of $18,555 to hire a professional
trail builder for a high-end flow section (~¾ mile), with naming rights for that specific
trail segment, oriented to outdoor recreation industry branding and consistent with the
County’s naming policy.
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Wilborn and carried 5-0 to approve granting
the naming rights to Triangle Off Road Association (TORC) for the specified trail section
in exchange for their $18,555 construction contribution and authorize the County Manager
to approve the chosen name
FY 2027-2031 RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN (CIP)
County Manager Katherine Cathey presented the following:
April 6, 2026
23
April 6, 2026
24
April 6, 2026
25
April 6, 2026
26
April 6, 2026
27
There were no questions by the Board for Cathey.
April 6, 2026
28
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPERTY TAX REFORM
County Manager Katherine Cathey presented an overview of state-level discussion
regarding a constitutional amendment to limit local property tax increases. She played a
short pre-recorded NCACC video, where NCACC Executive Director Kevin Leonard
shared concerns and advocated targeted relief over broad constitutional caps. Cathey
presented a draft Resolution opposing placing a vague tax cap amendment on the ballot
supporting local control and targeted relief.
Vice-Chair Wilborn stated that she liked the resolution; however, the language
needs to be re-worded. She stated that the resolution needed to be amended to add a clause
in the last paragraph, which makes the language stronger, explicitly opposing having the
amendment on the ballot and reinforcing the importance of local decision-making closest
to the voters.
County Attorney, T.C. Morphis, Jr. will redraft the resolution to strengthen the
final paragraph and circulate to the Board.
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Wilborn and carried 5-0 to approve a
Resolution Supporting Local Control of Property Tax Revenue, subject to attorney-
finalized language.
April 6, 2026
29
April 6, 2026
30
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
Chairman Puryear expressed thanks to all in attendance and for their undivided
attention during the meeting.
MANAGER’S REPORT
County Manager Katherine Cathey stated there is a petition going around for a pre-
disaster shelter plan. She stated that the County maintains an emergency shelter plan
(jointly managed by Emergency Management, DSS, and partners). She stated that the plan
is under active review and update. She stated that the County has occasionally opened
warming centers and refuge sites during extreme weather. She stated that participation has
been limited and that staff will continue evaluating options and community needs.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS/COMMENTS
Vice-Chair Wilborn stated that she attended a Transportation Advisory Committee
meeting and that they formed a subcommittee to advocate for Person County
transportation priorities within the regional scoring process, noting competitive
disadvantage with larger counties. She stated that she participated in meetings/tours
regarding Raleigh Regional Airport, and the Duke Energy Plant, and noted continued
engagement with delegation and partners. She stated that she attended the installation
ceremony for PCC President, Dr Lee. She raised concerns about space heaters, and
guidance referencing “cold-natured” employees. She requested review of comfort, safety,
and productivity impacts of temperature in offices. County Manager Cathey noted the trial
phase and that feedback is being gathered.
Commissioner Thomas thanked attendees for respectful participation and noted the
robust turnout.
Commissioner Royster extended Easter well-wishes. She stated that the Health
Department accreditation has been completed, and the final report is expected May 1,
2026. She commended Health Director Janet Clayton, who is also serving as interim WIC
Director. She stated that efforts are underway to fill the Extension Director position,
following the retirement of Bo Freeman. She stated that she is planning to attend the
Youth Livestock Show in Granville County. She stated that she attended two Chamber
ribbon cuttings, The Bakery Boxing Club fitness facility, and Timberlake Community
Food Bank, which serves ~1,000 families/month. She invited support for the Person
County Special Olympics on April 17, 2026 and indicated that the opening ceremony will
be held at 9:30 a.m. She stated that April is Child Abuse Awareness Month and that she
attended the pinwheel planting ceremony.
April 6, 2026
31
Royster stated that she also attended Good Morning Coffee Hour with Crossroads.
She advocated for the splashpad and stated that recreation needs have been recognized
since the 1970’s. She noted potential community support and grant opportunities, and
expressed that about 30% of the population remains underserved by current offerings. She
requested corrections if needed and sustained commitment to inclusive recreation.
Commissioner Long stated that the Mayo Lake stakeholder meeting is scheduled
for April 15, 2026. He stated that he attended the Fire Chiefs meeting, and it was
discussed that there are ongoing VHF radio issues. He noted an AHA (American Heart
Association) recommendation to discontinue the Lucas device while the County continues
payments from the 10-year refinancing. He stated that the Chiefs Association will
continue looking into this and that he would report back. He stated concerns related to the
budget. He stated that it is his position that the County reduce spending by 20%, reduce
the tax rate, pursue an industrial park land purchase and allocate Veterans Services and
DSS spaces within human services planning. He cited concerns and issues with the
Planning Department. He stated concerns related to Roxboro Community Redevelopment
Corporation (RCRC). He requested documentation and accountability. He stated that the
agreement item was for $60,000, which was to be used for shelter operations/furnishings,
and with no shelter currently operating, he questioned expenditures. He requested concise
reports dated 8/15/2024 and 8/15/2025, and if received, to provide copies. He requested
COI (certificate of insurance) and financial statements per agreement requirements. He
requested a copy of the financial audit from County Finance for the $60,000 expenditure
and taxpayer receipts. He expressed concerns about leadership accountability, and urged
the Board to provide vision and lead.
A motion was made by Commissioner Thomas and carried 5-0 to enter into
Closed Session at 9:32 p.m.
Chairman Puryear called the closed session to order at 9:33 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION #1
A motion to enter into Closed Session #1 per General Statute 143-318.11(a)(5) to
establish, or to instruct the public body's staff or negotiating agents concerning the
position to be taken by or on behalf of the public body in negotiating (i) the price and
other material terms of a contract or proposed contract for the acquisition of real property
by purchase, option, exchange, or lease; or (ii) the amount of compensation and other
material terms of an employment contract or proposed employment contract with the
following individuals permitted to attend: County Manager Katherine Cathey, Clerk to the
Board Michele Solomon, and County Attorney T.C. Morphis, Jr.
April 6, 2026
32
A motion was made by Vice-Chair Wilborn and carried 5-0 to return to open
session at 9:43 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Commissioner Royster and carried 5-0 to adjourn the
meeting at 9:45 p.m.
____________________________ ______________________________
Michele Solomon Kyle Puryear
Clerk to the Board Chairman